Home
Threats Fatlawi
18/07/2011
Mohammed Abdul Jabbar carp
Hanan al, a member of the House of Representatives, threatened to declare the names of the political blocs, which has rejected the vote on the no-confidence vote on the election commission.
The Fatlawi demanded, alongside a large number of council members, to withdraw confidence from the Commission after it has completed the interrogation. This is a constitutional and a normal turn to the Attorney the interrogator if the answers did not convince him that he questioned her.
But some political blocs refused, as understood from the words of Fatlawi. This would be in the room was closed and the camera did not leak anything to the media, and thus to citizens.
re «threat» Fatlawi to the forefront the question of the right of citizens to know what is going on in the corridors of the House of Representatives. Of their right to know what is going on in closed rooms and the corridors of confidentiality, but that it is entitled to know everything that is happening in Parliament, because Parliament is supposed to be representatives of the nation, and agents of the citizens in the conduct of matters of legislative and oversight of the country. Therefore, it is not acceptable constitutional and legal affairs of the parliament to be confidential, or that the House of hiding information. And therefore also the text of the Constitution on the public meetings of Parliament, except in special cases, understood and accepted. As that of the citizens' right to know who voted what, and who did not vote, or opposed, or abstained from voting. Up to this moment, such information is not available to citizens, as well as journalists. We know that the House decided such and such, but we do not have a database of shows, exhibitions and pro who refused to take the resolution. Needless to say, recall that the voting method used in the House of Representatives is still primitive, and that the Council's website on the Internet is still primitive also does not provide the citizen journalist or the necessary information, like what the other sites of parliaments in the developed world. A simple look to the site of the U.S. Congress, for example, shows the huge difference. At the same time, our press does not fill the shortfall, but is only of the circuit including the media give it back to the House of Representatives. The Service is acting like the media offices of the ministries. According to this method, as stated by the Pharaoh of Egypt: «not only show you what I see»! Thus the citizen and the journalist remained ignorant of a lot of important details.
no need to threaten to disclose. To be detected from. That the Fatlawi and the other deputies to take the initiative and are a normal way, not marred by anything from the threat and warning, to provide people with information about what is going on. This function of Representatives: to familiarize themselves with their constituents on things. It's not in a feud with one, but it is our right, as citizens, to know. We are not in a dictatorship things walking country and the people under a heavy veil of secrecy, as was the case at the time of the dictatorial regime of Saddam backward.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
18/07/2011
Mohammed Abdul Jabbar carp
Hanan al, a member of the House of Representatives, threatened to declare the names of the political blocs, which has rejected the vote on the no-confidence vote on the election commission.
The Fatlawi demanded, alongside a large number of council members, to withdraw confidence from the Commission after it has completed the interrogation. This is a constitutional and a normal turn to the Attorney the interrogator if the answers did not convince him that he questioned her.
But some political blocs refused, as understood from the words of Fatlawi. This would be in the room was closed and the camera did not leak anything to the media, and thus to citizens.
re «threat» Fatlawi to the forefront the question of the right of citizens to know what is going on in the corridors of the House of Representatives. Of their right to know what is going on in closed rooms and the corridors of confidentiality, but that it is entitled to know everything that is happening in Parliament, because Parliament is supposed to be representatives of the nation, and agents of the citizens in the conduct of matters of legislative and oversight of the country. Therefore, it is not acceptable constitutional and legal affairs of the parliament to be confidential, or that the House of hiding information. And therefore also the text of the Constitution on the public meetings of Parliament, except in special cases, understood and accepted. As that of the citizens' right to know who voted what, and who did not vote, or opposed, or abstained from voting. Up to this moment, such information is not available to citizens, as well as journalists. We know that the House decided such and such, but we do not have a database of shows, exhibitions and pro who refused to take the resolution. Needless to say, recall that the voting method used in the House of Representatives is still primitive, and that the Council's website on the Internet is still primitive also does not provide the citizen journalist or the necessary information, like what the other sites of parliaments in the developed world. A simple look to the site of the U.S. Congress, for example, shows the huge difference. At the same time, our press does not fill the shortfall, but is only of the circuit including the media give it back to the House of Representatives. The Service is acting like the media offices of the ministries. According to this method, as stated by the Pharaoh of Egypt: «not only show you what I see»! Thus the citizen and the journalist remained ignorant of a lot of important details.
no need to threaten to disclose. To be detected from. That the Fatlawi and the other deputies to take the initiative and are a normal way, not marred by anything from the threat and warning, to provide people with information about what is going on. This function of Representatives: to familiarize themselves with their constituents on things. It's not in a feud with one, but it is our right, as citizens, to know. We are not in a dictatorship things walking country and the people under a heavy veil of secrecy, as was the case at the time of the dictatorial regime of Saddam backward.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
