Home
Federal decide the unconstitutionality of a law the terms of retirement
Tuesday 10.20.2015 0:44
WAP / Baghdad news
of the Federal Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional a items Unified Retirement Law No. 9 for the year 2014 for salary pension ambassadors, stressing that the legislation was contrary to the text of the Constitution. A spokesman for the judiciary Judge Abdul Sattar Berkdr in a statement received news agency Baghdad International / WAP / copy of it, "the Federal Supreme Court held on Monday, its considered the proceedings before it." He continued Bayrakdar, that "the Court has decided that the constitutionality of item (vi) of Article 35 of the Uniform Code of retirement No. 9 of 2014". He added that " This item regards entitlement Ambassador at his retirement pension by 80% of the salary and allowances received by his peers at the ministry center, not to exceed allocations of 100% of the career salary. "He explained that" this item came from the House of Representatives was not present in the the budget bill and without the House of Representatives is due to the Council of Ministers in the development of this text, although it involves a financial bush. "
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Tuesday 10.20.2015 0:44
WAP / Baghdad news
of the Federal Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional a items Unified Retirement Law No. 9 for the year 2014 for salary pension ambassadors, stressing that the legislation was contrary to the text of the Constitution. A spokesman for the judiciary Judge Abdul Sattar Berkdr in a statement received news agency Baghdad International / WAP / copy of it, "the Federal Supreme Court held on Monday, its considered the proceedings before it." He continued Bayrakdar, that "the Court has decided that the constitutionality of item (vi) of Article 35 of the Uniform Code of retirement No. 9 of 2014". He added that " This item regards entitlement Ambassador at his retirement pension by 80% of the salary and allowances received by his peers at the ministry center, not to exceed allocations of 100% of the career salary. "He explained that" this item came from the House of Representatives was not present in the the budget bill and without the House of Representatives is due to the Council of Ministers in the development of this text, although it involves a financial bush. "
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
